Convert PTE to IELTS scores

Note: using the upper end of the PTE equivalence range provides a more conservative and defensible admissions threshold, reducing the risk that candidates admitted on PTE scores are underprepared relative to those meeting the same IELTS band requirement.

How to link PTE to IELTS band scores?

The table summarises the IELTS and PTE equivalencies. It's based on the results of a concordance study conducted in 2024 between the enhanced PTE Academic and IELTS Academic and was released in 2025. We encourage test users to review the full report online to understand this equivalency study.

PTE updates scoring & marking process

Pearson announced in November 2024 that the "Describe Image" and "Retell Lecture" sections of the PTE-A speaking exam will now involve a human review, marking a significant shift that could make the test harder for candidates. This change disrupts established preparation methods that often relied on templates and introduces uncertainty, as test takers now face ambiguity around how their responses will be judged.

In 2025, PTE Academic introduced a further round of changes, adding new speaking tasks and expanding human oversight across a wider range of responses. For test takers, this means preparation strategies may need frequent adjustment as the assessment evolves

The lack of clarity about who these "human experts" are and their qualifications for scoring adds confusion, potentially undermining the fairness of the PTE scoring process. In contrast, IELTS has consistently used qualified human examiners for scoring, ensuring transparency, fairness and reliability. This consistency has contributed to the global trust placed in IELTS, with 12,500 organisations worldwide accepting its results as a benchmark of true English proficiency.

Who has made changes to PTE score requirements?

To mitigate risk, the Australian Government changed English requirements in August 2025. Leading institutions have also increased PTE score requirements, the University of Melbourne in May 2024.

IELTS results are reported on a 9-band scale. They are designed to be simple and easy to understand. IELTS reports as band scores on a scale from 1 (the lowest) to 9 (the highest). Conversely, PTE Academic (PTE-A) scores against their own “Global Scale of English”. This is a granular score scale from 10 to 90.

The following is a simplified conversion table between IELTS and PTE-A. Check the full conversion table.

Making comparisons between scores on different tests is challenging. That’s because test products differ in their design, purpose, and format. And, the greater the difference in design the more problematic the exercise is. Nonetheless, test score users (such as Universities, Governments and professional bodies) are often interested to know how, for practical purposes, results on two differing tests may compare.

Investigating the Relationship between Pearson PTE Scores and IELTS Bands

A number of reports have investigated the relationship between PTE Academic and IELTS Academic. An earlier report by Saville, O'Sullivan and Clark (2021) summarises the findings of a small-scale empirical study intended to explore the relationship between scores on the IELTS test and scores on the Pearson Test of English Academic (PTE Academic), conducted as part of a programme of work exploring the comparability of different approaches to test design. A more recent study, released in 2025, was also conducted by Pearson.

Updated in 2026. Note: using the upper end of the PTE equivalence range provides a more conservative and defensible admissions threshold, reducing the risk that candidates admitted on PTE scores are underprepared relative to those meeting the same IELTS band requirement.

See the alignment of IELTS band scores and Pearson PTE scores (Equipercentile Equating)

An equipercentile equating approach was used in the Pearson study to align the score distributions and generate concordance tables. This method aimed to match percentile ranks across the two tests, ensuring that equivalent percentiles represent comparable levels of underlying ability. Its symmetrical and intuitive nature makes it suited to high‑stakes selection contexts, where comparable thresholds are required. The analysis was conducted in R using loglinear pre-smoothing, with PTE Academic as the reference scale and equated IELTS scores rounded to the nearest half band.

IELTS 7.0 (no sub-band less than 7.0)

To ensure your applicants meet your English language requirements, your PTE-A equivalent score should be:

• A minimum PTE-A overall score between 63-70, and

• Minimum between 58-63 in Listening; 59-64 in Reading; 76-82 in Speaking; and 69-76 in Writing

Note: Using the upper end of the PTE equivalence range provides a more conservative and defensible admissions threshold, reducing the risk that candidates admitted on PTE scores are underprepared relative to those meeting the same IELTS band requirement.

IELTS 6.5 (no sub-band less than 6.0)

To ensure your applicants meet your English language requirements, your PTE-A equivalent score should be:

• A minimum PTE-A overall score between 55-62, and

• Minimum between 47-54 in Listening; 47-52 in Reading; 48-53 in Speaking; and 51-59 in Writing

Note: Using the upper end of the PTE equivalence range provides a more conservative and defensible admissions threshold, reducing the risk that candidates admitted on PTE scores are underprepared relative to those meeting the same IELTS band requirement.

Official IELTS Score Guide

Every IELTS test is designed to take test takers forward. It ensures they’re ready for the conversations of their future. Ready to learn, share and collaborate through English. Because IELTS assesses English in real life situations, it gives you a true understanding of a student’s ability to perform. Also, it’s why over 12,500 global organisations trust IELTS applicants are ready for their next step. IELTS supports successful futures at your organisation. Moreover, we share with you how we test, and we’re transparent in how we mark the test. So, for IELTS Writing, Speaking, Reading and Listening, we’re open about what our examiners look for.

Quality and fairness

IELTS invests heavily in the continued development of its test and the processes. Leading academics and researchers worldwide contribute to the continued development and improvement of IELTS. This is to ensure a fair assessment for all test takers. And, it is to ensure a reliable result for the organisations that depend on IELTS as a measure of English language skill.

Security and integrity

IELTS takes a multi-layered approach to test security, including a variety of measures taken before test day, on test day and after test day. We give recognised organisations access to a secure, online platform to verify IELTS results.

Understanding what’s at stake when organisations lower the bar in English language testing

Research by the IELTS partners has shed a light on the importance of educational institutions and organisations setting the right English language scores for their candidates. This early research, conducted with over 500 test takers who had sat both IELTS and Pearson Test of English (PTE), showed there was significant and concerning variability between the previously commonly accepted PTE benchmarks. New research has corrected some of this variability.

New research

Further research is released by various authors as many organisations review the stopgaps put in place when language testing was interrupted at the height of pandemic restrictions. The results showed the overall band scores were relatively comparable with the established PTE benchmarks, with only minor variations at the high band scores of IELTS 8 and above. However, when looking at the individual sub-scores (listening, reading, writing and speaking) of the two tests, the results differed greatly from previously published benchmark reports which are still relied upon by many organisations. Warwick Freeland, Managing Director – IELTS, said the findings highlighted the importance of carefully examining the criteria of different test providers. “Language assessment is complex. Comparing scores between different test providers is even more so,” Mr Freeland said. “It is important we get it right,” he said.

“Research shows the benchmarks that are often used to compare scores from different language test suppliers may not be reliable.” “When accepting results from different test providers, it is important for institutions to be confident candidates are assessed on a like-for-like basis.”

Risks for organisations

Mr Freeland said there were social and financial risks for organisations and students when inaccurate and outdated test equivalencies are relied upon uncritically. “If candidates are accepted based on tests that don’t align, they risk being set up to fail if they cannot keep up in the classroom or work environment, in turn causing emotional stress.” “The financial and real-life risks for organisations who accept people without the language skills they need to be successful is also a real and significant risk.”

Some organisations may rely on more than one test for English language proficiency. However, comparing test scores is notoriously difficult.

The following tables that provide an equivalency between IELTS, the Canadian Language Benchmarks, Cambridge Assessment English (CAE), and the CEFR are all based on extensive research. This will help organisations to have confidence that they are treating all test takers fairly and setting their applicants up for success.

Equivalencies between the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLBs) (for English) and the results of language tests from designated testing organisations have been established. To review the full equivalencies table, visit the Canadian Government website. This table below shows the official relationship between CLB and IELTS General Training: More about IELTS for Canada

Source: Government of Canada, cited 14 February 2026

Cambridge Assessment English’s B2 First and C1 Advanced both report on the Cambridge English Scale. The table below shows the relationship between Cambridge English Scale and IELTS:

Source: Comparing scores to IELTS B2 First and C1 Advanced, Cambridge Assessment English, cited 14 February 2026. 

IELTS test users may find the Council of Europe’s Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) helpful. The framework is a series of descriptions of abilities at different learning levels that can be applied to any language. It can provide a starting point for interpreting and comparing different language qualifications and is increasingly used as a way of benchmarking language ability around the world.

We have created a PDF with more information about IELTS and the CEFR. It also includes an FAQ section to answer your most common questions.

Access IELTS and the CEFR

Book your IELTS test now